MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096799592 · doi:10.1115/gt2015-42682

Snecma’s Viewpoint on the Numerical and Experimental Simulation of Blade-Tip/Casing Unilateral Contacts

2015· preprint· en· W2096799592 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTribology and Lubrication Engineering
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCasingStatorRotor (electric)Gas compressorTurbojetMechanical engineeringMaterials scienceBlade (archaeology)Context (archaeology)CoatingStructural engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aircraft engine manufacturers are developping a new generation of turbojet engines featuring a lower impact on the environment, increased performances as well as reduced gas consumption. The efficiency of an engine is mostly driven by the operating clearance between the rotating parts and the stator. Accordingly, modern designs focus on the minimization of these clearances. In this context, unavoidable rotor imbalances or mistuning stemming from manufacturing processes as well as distortions resulting from thermal expansion or assembly conditions may generate blade-tip/casing contacts that are now considered as non-accidental operating conditions. In order to minimize the consequences of such events, an abradable coating is sprayed along the inner surface of the casing and acts as a fuse when the blade and the casing are in contact. However, even when an abradable coating is used, significant structural damages and wear as well as blade failures have been witnessed experimentally. The understanding of the physical phenomena at play called, on one hand, for throrough experimental investigations of rotor/stator contacts on full-scale stages of compressors and underlined that blade failure is mainly due to vibratory fatigue although the abradable coating is worn. On the other hand, numerical simulations have been performed to better understand the blade dynamics: over the last decade Snecma and its academic partners jointly developed a code for the simulation of contacts between rotor and stator: COROS. This code allows for the simulation of contacts — with a Lagrange multiplier contact treatment procedure — between full 3D models of engine components and accounts for abradable coating material removal. In particular, the simulation of experimental set-ups with COROS highlighted the correlation between the blade vibratory response and the abradable material removal. Yet still an experimental code, this paper addresses the integration of COROS within the design process of aircraft engine blades at Snecma. The paper focuses on on-going research for the identification of critical parameters in the arising of interactions as early as the design stage of components. A particular attention is paid to the mechanical properties of the abradable coating for which both experimental and numerical investigations are detailed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.671

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTribology and Lubrication EngineeringFrench-language works237,207