MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096847040 · doi:10.1109/wescan.1993.270577

A sensor to characterize particles for the control and monitoring of agricultural or mining processes

2002· article· en· W2096847040 on OpenAlexaff
Jolanda Cibere, Eric Salt, S. Kumar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSensor Technology and Measurement Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVibrationParticle (ecology)Pulse (music)Elastic modulusTransducerRADIUSAcousticsParticle sizeComputer scienceBiological systemMaterials sciencePhysicsEngineeringDetectorComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors introduce a model of a sensor system that can form the basis to measure particle characteristics by analyzing the vibrations caused by their elastic impact upon a thin plate. In this simple sensor model, the impacting particle generates a force pulse that has its shape influenced by the particle radius, density, impact velocity and modulus of elasticity. This force pulse can be estimated by analyzing the plate vibrations as measured by the transducer. A sensor based on this model could provide a number of particle characteristics in real time, and determine size distribution or perform particle discrimination by having a sample of the particle impact upon the sensor. The factors determining the generation of the force pulse and the thin plate's response to this pulse are discussed. A system model and analysis is then reviewed. Finally some considerations in the design of a sensor are examined.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSensor Technology and Measurement SystemsFrench-language works237,207