RISK-SMOOTHING ACROSS TIME AND THE DEMAND FOR INVENTORIES: A MEAN-VARIANCE APPROACH
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The standard production smoothing model of inventory demand cannot represent the added incentives for smoothing risks or explain the impact of market shocks that independently affect expectations and uncertainty. Those limitations are overcome by modeling inventory demand as a problem in deterministic optimal control, with the risk-averse firm maximizing utility that is a separable function of the mean and variance of returns and the firm controlling on two decision variables, production and inventory investment. Support for the mean-variance approach comes from regressions using Survey of Professional Forecasters data to show how changes in the mean forecasts of the GDP price deflator and changes in the disagreement among deflator forecasts can explain changes in aggregate inventory investment over time. Further support comes from the ability of the model to explain the excess volatility of industry output over sales—a fact at odds with the production smoothing theory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it