Risk of dementia in people with depressive and bipolar disorders increases with increasing number of prior affective episodes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kessing LV, Andersen PK. Does the risk of developing dementia increase with the number of episodes in patients with depressive disorder and in patients with bipolar disorder? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75:1662–6.[OpenUrl][1][Abstract/FREE Full Text][2] Q Does an increasing number of prior affective episodes increase the risk of developing dementia in people with depressive and bipolar disorders? ### ![Graphic][3]</img>Design: Cohort study. ### ![Graphic][4]</img>Follow up period: 14 years. ### ![Graphic][5]</img>Setting: Denmark from 1970 to 1999. ### ![Graphic][6]</img>People: 18 726 people with depressive disorder (ICD-8) and 4248 people with bipolar disorder (ICD-10). Inclusions: people who at their first discharge from a psychiatric hospital after 1 January 1970 had a diagnosis of primary affective disorder. Main exclusions: diagnosis of organic psychosis or schizophrenia at discharge before 1 January 1986. ### ![Graphic][7]</img>Risk factors: The Denmark nationwide … [1]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DJournal%2Bof%2BNeurology%252C%2BNeurosurgery%2B%2526%2BPsychiatry%26rft.stitle%253DJ.%2BNeurol.%2BNeurosurg.%2BPsychiatry%26rft.aulast%253DKessing%26rft.auinit1%253DL%2BV%26rft.volume%253D75%26rft.issue%253D12%26rft.spage%253D1662%26rft.epage%253D1666%26rft.atitle%253DDoes%2Bthe%2Brisk%2Bof%2Bdeveloping%2Bdementia%2Bincrease%2Bwith%2Bthe%2Bnumber%2Bof%2Bepisodes%2Bin%2Bpatients%2Bwith%2Bdepressive%2Bdisorder%2Band%2Bin%2Bpatients%2Bwith%2Bbipolar%2Bdisorder%253F%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1136%252Fjnnp.2003.031773%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F15548477%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [2]: /lookup/ijlink?linkType=ABST&journalCode=jnnp&resid=75/12/1662&atom=%2Febmental%2F8%2F2%2F46.atom [3]: /embed/inline-graphic-1.gif [4]: /embed/inline-graphic-2.gif [5]: /embed/inline-graphic-3.gif [6]: /embed/inline-graphic-4.gif [7]: /embed/inline-graphic-5.gif
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".