MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096889687 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2004.1327067

New modulo decomposed residue-to-binary algorithm for general moduli sets

2004· article· en· W2096889687 on OpenAlexaff
Shaoqiang Bi, Wei Wang, A.J. Al-Khalili

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Residue Arithmetic
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModuloChinese remainder theoremModulo operationModuliMathematicsBinary numberPrimitive root modulo nResidue number systemDiscrete mathematicsArithmeticAlgorithmCombinatoricsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a new modulo arithmetic theorem to decompose the base of modulo operations. This new theorem has been used to reduce further the modulo size of the modified CRT (Chinese remainder theorem) for general moduli sets. Furthermore, we have applied the modulo decomposition technique and the modulo improved CRT to derive a R/B (residue-to-binary) converter algorithm for a newly found three-moduli set, M={2/sup n/-1,2/sup n/, 2/sup n-1/-1}. In comparison to the modified CRT, the improved CRT can cut the modulo size by half and reduce the length of the modulo operator in terms of 36%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.727
Threshold uncertainty score0.794

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryptography and Residue ArithmeticFrench-language works237,207