MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096903203 · doi:10.1142/s1793525309000084

TOPOLOGICAL 4-MANIFOLDS WITH GEOMETRICALLY TWO-DIMENSIONAL FUNDAMENTAL GROUPS

2009· article· en· W2096903203 on OpenAlexafffund
Ian Hambleton, Matthias Kreck, Peter Teichner

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Topology and Analysis · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGeometric and Algebraic Topology
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHausdorff Center for Mathematics
KeywordsMathematicsCobordismFundamental groupEquivariant mapHomeomorphism (graph theory)Pure mathematicsInvariant (physics)Intersection (aeronautics)Topology (electrical circuits)Discrete mathematicsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Closed oriented 4-manifolds with the same geometrically two-dimensional fundamental group (satisfying certain properties) are classified up to s-cobordism by their w 2 -type, equivariant intersection form and the Kirby–Siebenmann invariant. As an application, we obtain a complete homeomorphism classification of closed oriented 4-manifolds with solvable Baumslag–Solitar fundamental groups, including a precise realization result.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Topology and AnalysisSame topicGeometric and Algebraic TopologyFrench-language works237,207