MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096909280 · doi:10.1139/p09-106

Ex situ measurement of strain associated with hot tearing in AZ91D and AE42 magnesium alloys using neutron diffraction Special issue on Neutron Scattering in Canada.

2010· article· en· W2096909280 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Lukas Bichler, C. Ravindran, D. Sediako

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityCanadian Nuclear Laboratories
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTearingNeutron diffractionUltimate tensile strengthStrain rateAlloyMetallurgyMagnesium alloyNeutron scatteringStress (linguistics)MicrostructureCastingMaterials scienceComposite materialDiffractionPhysicsScatteringOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Prevention of hot tearing during casting or welding of commercial alloys remains a challenge for numerous industrial applications. The tendency of an alloy to tear is related to the alloy’s microstructure, solidification rate, and the stress/strain conditions it experiences during solidification. Due to technological challenges in performing accurate and reliable measurements, there remains a paucity of quantitative experimental data on the stress/strain conditions associated with the onset of hot hearing. This paper reports on a novel approach to quantify strain at the onset of hot tearing in two magnesium alloys. Neutron diffraction strain mapping was carried out and revealed that in the case of the AZ91D alloy, tensile strain of ∼0.05% was associated with initiation of material’s plastic damage and hot tearing, while for the AE42 alloy the critical strain was ∼0.09%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.922
Threshold uncertainty score0.680

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicAluminum Alloy Microstructure PropertiesFrench-language works237,207