MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

U1RNP positive neonatal lupus erythematosus: association with anti-La antibodies?

2006· review· en· W2096935199 on OpenAlexaff
Anita P. Sheth, Nancy B. Esterly, S.L. RATOOSH, Julian P. Smith, Adelaide A. Hebert, E D Silverman

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Dermatology · 2006
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAntibodyLupus erythematosusImmunologySystemic lupus erythematosusAssociation (psychology)DermatologyInternal medicineDiseasePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neonatal lupus erythematosus (NLE) is an antibody-mediated disorder most commonly associated with autoantibodies to Ro and/or La antigens. There have been five previous reports describing eight NLE patients with anti-U1RNP antibody in the absence of anti-Ro and anti-La autoantibodies. We report two cases of anti-U1RNP antibody-positive NLE, and briefly review the five previous reports. The diagnosis of NLE was based on physical examination and serological studies by ELISA, immunodiffusion, and immunoblotting. By conventional immunodiffusion and ELISA, our cases were negative for anti-Ro and anti-La antibodies, and positive for anti-U1RNP antibody. However, one of the mothers had anti-La antibody detected by immunoblot assay only. All anti-U1RNP antibody-positive infants had classic cutaneous lesions of NLE, but it is of interest that none had congenital heart block (CHB). Although these infants were negative for anti-Ro and anti-La antibodies with immunodiffusion and ELISA techniques, these antibodies might be detectable by immunoblotting, as was the case in one of the mothers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations67
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of DermatologySame topicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchFrench-language works237,207