MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096969048 · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2007.896127

Source-Matched Spreading Codes for Optical CDMA

2007· article· en· W2096969048 on OpenAlexaff
Sharon Goldberg, V. Baby, Ting Wang, Paul R. Prucnal

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topicgraph theory and CDMA systems
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersCenter for High Performance Computing
KeywordsPuncturingCode division multiple accessComputer scienceBit error rateElectronic engineeringConvolutional codePhysical layerProbability of errorCode (set theory)Computer networkTelecommunicationsAlgorithmChannel (broadcasting)Decoding methodsEngineeringWirelessSet (abstract data type)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Puncturing is studied as a physical layer mechanism for efficiently transmitting datastreams containing bits of unequal priority via wavelength-time optical code-division multiple access. Puncturing increases system capacity, while ensuring that important bits are received with low bit-error rate

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score0.616

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CommunicationsSame topicgraph theory and CDMA systemsFrench-language works237,207