Efficient FFT-Accelerated Approach to Invariant Optical–LIDAR Registration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a fast Fourier transform (FFT)-accelerated approach designed to handle many of the difficulties associated with the registration of optical and light detection and ranging (LIDAR) images. The proposed algorithm utilizes an exhaustive region correspondence search technique to determine the correspondence between regions of interest from the optical image with the LIDAR image over all translations for various rotations. The computational cost associated with exhaustive search is greatly reduced by exploiting the FFT. The substantial differences in intensity mappings between optical and LIDAR images are addressed through local feature mapping transformation optimization. Geometric distortions in the underlying images are dealt with through a geometric transformation estimation process that handles various transformations such as translation, rotation, scaling, shear, and perspective transformations. To account for mismatches caused by factors such as severe contrast differences, the proposed algorithm attempts to prune such outliers using the random sample consensus technique to improve registration accuracy. The proposed algorithm has been tested using various optical and LIDAR images and evaluated based on its registration accuracy. The results indicate that the proposed algorithm is suitable for the multimodal invariant registration of optical and LIDAR images.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".