MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096993472 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2004.1349744

Radio over multimode fiber for wireless access

2004· article· en· W2096993472 on OpenAlexaff
Roland Yuen, Xavier Fernando, Sridhar Krishnan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Photonic Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMulti-mode optical fiberRadio over fiberBandwidth (computing)Electronic engineeringComputer scienceMaterials scienceOptical fiberTelecommunicationsOpticsPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A radio over fiber link is a promising technology for antenna remoting applications. Typically, the radio over fiber link employs a single mode fiber. However, the signal power at the remote antenna is very small. The main reason is large power loss in the E/O and O/E convertor, but the coupling efficiency of a E/O convertor can be improved with multimode fiber (MMF), so we propose to use a ROF link with a vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser with a graded index MMF to transport optical signals. A multimode fiber has a larger core radius compared to a SMF. A larger core radius allows more optical power coupled into a fiber. With simple butt-coupling techniques, the coupling efficiency can be 90% and simplicity leads to reduction in cost of the link. Normally, the MMF is used in short distance digital applications with a bandwidth distance product of about 500 MHz.km, so it is good for local area picocells. Our approach is to transmit passband signals such as QPSK and FSK through the ROF link. Our simulation shows that a 900 MHz carrier can transport through a link of 1.22 km long. In this paper, we investigate the feasibility of using a MMF for antenna remoting in local area picocells and compare the tradeoff between coupling efficiency and bandwidth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Photonic Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207