MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097016224 · doi:10.1109/icccyb.2010.5491218

Real-time collaborative intelligent services for sensor networks

2010· article· en· W2097016224 on OpenAlexaff
Cristian Gadea, Bogdan Ionescu, Dan Ionescu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Management and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSensor webComputer scienceWireless sensor networkWeb serviceAjaxArchitectureService (business)Variety (cybernetics)World Wide WebComputer networkDatabaseKey distribution in wireless sensor networksTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sensor networks that distribute real-time GIS (Geographic Information System) data are being deployed across the world more than ever as it becomes increasingly affordable and important for scientific and government agencies to monitor environmental phenomena. As the amount of data sources increases, the lack of services for connecting users to the appropriate sensor networks becomes very apparent. The real-time collection and analysis of data from a large variety of heterogeneous sensor sources is currently difficult due to the lack of a standard architecture to expose the capabilities of a particular sensor network. What is needed is a service-oriented architecture (SOA) that allows sensor data to be exposed as collaborative services which are accessible from within a typical web-browser. We propose a solution that allows real-time access to the appropriate sensor network data for multi-user web-based collaboration via a publisher/subscriber architecture. To evaluate the proposed architecture, we show how a AJAX-based and a Flash-based web application are able to gain access to the real-time sensor data services and collaborate on the data in novel ways.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.884
Threshold uncertainty score0.339

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicData Management and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207