MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097027883 · doi:10.1353/his.0.0056

Legal Ideology in the Aftermath of Rebellion: The Convicted First Nations Participants, 1885

2009· article· fr· W2097027883 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Ted McCoy

Bibliographic record

VenueHistoire sociale · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicColonialism, slavery, and trade
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMajestyIdeologyEconomic JusticeContext (archaeology)LawColonialismCriminologyElement (criminal law)Political scienceSociologyHistoryPoliticsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Des membres des Premières nations faisaient partie des membres de la Rébellion du Nord-Ouest de 1885 qui ont été déclarés coupables. L'examen des peines qui ont été infligées à ces condamnés nous éclaire sur la compromission dont les idéologies juridiques – comme la majesté, la justice et la clémence – étaient susceptibles de faire l'objet une fois transposées dans le contexte colonial et transculturel spécifique à la conjoncture du Nord-Ouest de la fin du XIX e siècle. L'auteur révèle également un élément mal interprété et important de la Rébellion du Nord-Ouest en tenant compte de l'expérience des participants subissant les démêlés juridiques de celle-ci.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.917
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistoire socialeSame topicColonialism, slavery, and tradeFrench-language works237,207