MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097032778 · doi:10.1109/cisda.2011.5945952

Detection of stationary network load increase using univariate network aggregate traffic data by dynamic PCA

2011· article· en· W2097032778 on OpenAlexaff
Shengkun Xie, Anna T. Ławniczak

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceNetwork traffic simulationNetwork traffic controlTraffic generation modelNetwork packetPrincipal component analysisUnivariateData miningQuality of serviceReal-time computingComputer networkArtificial intelligenceMachine learningMultivariate statistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Network operators are now facing bandwidth outages as well as a growing pressure to ensure good Quality of Service (QoS). An important practical issue for network service providers is to pay close attention to the load changes of network traffic, in particular, the stationary increase of load from a normal demand. Many network monitoring applications and performance analysis tools are based on the study of an aggregate measure of network traffic, e.g. number of packets in transit (NPT), which is a long-term univariate time series. To classify this type of network traffic data and detect any increase of network source load, we propose a dynamic principal component analysis (PCA) method, first to extract data features and then to detect a stationary load increase of network traffic. The proposed detection schemes are based on either the major or the minor principal components of network traffic data. To demonstrate the applications of the proposed feature extraction method and the detection schemes, we applied them to network traffic data simulated from the packet switching network (PSN) model. Additionally, we propose a combined detection scheme that uses both the major and the minor principal components. The proposed detection schemes, based on dynamic PCA, show enhanced performance in detecting an increase of network load for the simulated network traffic data. These results offer a new feature extraction method based on dynamic PCA that creates additional feature variables for event detection in a univariate time series.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207