MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097060502 · doi:10.1109/pes.2007.386230

Mitigation of Adverse Effects of Midpoint Shunt- FACTS Compensated Transmission Lines on Distance Protection Schemes

2007· article· en· W2097060502 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems Fault Detection
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMidpointStatic VAR compensatorShunt (medical)Transmission lineComputer scienceElectric power transmissionControl theory (sociology)Real Time Digital SimulatorTransmission (telecommunications)VoltageElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringEngineeringElectric power systemAC powerTelecommunicationsControl (management)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents practical solutions to mitigate the adverse effects on distance protection schemes when they are used to protect transmission networks that are compensated by shunt connected flexible AC transmission system (FACTS) controllers/devices. Two types of shunt-FACTS devices, static var compensator (SVC) and static synchronous compensator (STATCOM), are considered and designed to regulate the midpoint voltage of the transmission line. The mitigation techniques are implemented in commercial relays and tested using real time digital simulator (RTDS). The results show the effectiveness of the proposed modifications to the channel aided distance protection schemes under various faults and varying operating conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.388
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it