El enfoque crítico: una revisión de su historia, naturaleza y algunas aplicaciones
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La intención de este artículo es explorar las bases filosóficas e históricas de los múltiples y complejos significados y usos del Pensamiento Critico (PC). El PC es definido como un método, analítico y autoreflexivo, teóricamente sustentado, de crítica de ideologías y prácticas convencionales, incluyendo la vida cotidiana, los sistemas políticos, el método científico de crear conocimientos y los del mismo PC. Su propósito es reunir valores morales y científicos. El artículo contiene cuatro partes. La primera discute las diversas acepciones de PC. La segunda traza el origen histórico del PC, su articulación teórica por la Escuela de Frankfurt y las múltiples contribuciones filosóficas que enriquecieron y ampliaron su significado. La tercera parte discute sus requisitos epistemológicos, morales y metodológicos y la última parte presenta algunos ejemplos de las múltiples aplicaciones del PC en varios campos
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".