MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097123200 · doi:10.1016/j.alter.2011.11.003

Handicap et sexualité

2011· article· fr· W2097123200 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAlter · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, Medicine and Society
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman sexualityHumanitiesPopulationPsychologySociologyGender studiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’objectif de ce texte est d’interroger, d’un point de vue critique, les différentes manières de penser la misère sexuelle des personnes handicapées, d’une part et, d’autre part, les solutions possibles à ce problème. L’aide sexuelle directe (la prostitution, l’assistance et le bénévolat) demeure une issue partielle et technique, donc insatisfaisante face à la misère sexuelle. Une telle solution risque non seulement de développer une vision fataliste de la misère sexuelle, mais également une représentation simplifiée de la vie sexuelle des personnes handicapées ainsi qu’une dépendance envers l’aide sexuelle. Les interventions sexologiques auprès de cette population doivent donc chercher à développer des projets d’intégration et de participation sociales donnant aux personnes handicapées les connaissances et les compétences nécessaires à faire d’elles des citoyens sexuels actifs et autonomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.384
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.173
GPT teacher head0.455
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it