MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097146349 · doi:10.1109/case.1992.200156

ROOM: an object-oriented methodology for developing real-time systems

2003· article· en· W2097146349 on OpenAlexaff
Bran Selić, Garth Gullekson, John McGee, I. Engelberg

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicModel-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
Canadian institutionsBell (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSoftware engineeringObject-oriented programmingProcess (computing)Iterative and incremental developmentSet (abstract data type)Domain (mathematical analysis)Object (grammar)Software developmentSoftwareSystems engineeringProgramming languageArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Real-time object-oriented modeling (ROOM), an object-oriented methodology for the development of real-time systems supported by a commercial computer-aided software engineering (CASE) toolset, is presented. This methodology has been driven by industrial experience, and is founded on a set of principles which fulfil the need to produce high-quality software more rapidly and more efficiently than by traditional methods. The principles include the definition and use of powerful domain-specific modeling abstractions, the elimination of error-prone discontinuities during development, and a highly iterative development process based on advanced tool support. An overview of the conceptual framework and the development process model of ROOM is given.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicModel-Driven Software Engineering TechniquesFrench-language works237,207