MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097150676 · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-09-3013

<i>Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 3</i> Mutation Analysis on Voided Urine for Surveillance of Patients with Low-Grade Non-Muscle–Invasive Bladder Cancer

2010· article· en· W2097150676 on OpenAlexaff
Tahlita C.M. Zuiverloon, Madelon N.M. van der Aa, Theodorus van der Kwast, Ewout W. Steyerberg, Hester F. Lingsma, Chris H. Bangma, Ellen C. Zwarthoff

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health Network
FundersKWF Kankerbestrijding
KeywordsConcomitantUrineBladder cancerMedicineCystoscopyFibroblast growth factor receptor 3UrologyInternal medicineGastroenterologyProportional hazards modelProspective cohort studyCancerUrinary systemPathologyFibroblast growth factorReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Mutations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) have been found in 70% of the low-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMI-BC) tumors. We aim to determine the potential of FGFR3 mutation analysis on voided urine to detect recurrences during surveillance of patients with low-grade NMI-BC. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: FGFR3 mutation status of the study inclusion tumor was determined from 200 low-grade NMI-BC patients. Patients with an FGFR3-mutant inclusion tumor were selected for analysis and monitored by cystoscopy, and voided urine samples were collected. FGFR3 mutation analysis was done on 463 prospectively collected urines. Sensitivity and predictive value of the assay were determined for detection of concomitant recurrences. Longitudinal and Cox time-to-event analyses were done to determine the predictive value for detection of future recurrences. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 3.5 years. The sensitivity of the assay for detection of concomitant recurrences was 26 of 45 (58%). Of the 105 positive urine samples, 85 (81%) were associated with a concomitant or a future recurrence. An FGFR3-positive urine was associated with a 3.8-fold (P < 0.0001) higher risk of having a recurrence in the Cox analysis. In contrast, only 41 of 358 (11%) FGFR3-negative urine samples were associated with a recurrence. Positive predictive value increased from 25% to 90% in patients having consecutive FGFR3-positive urine tests. CONCLUSIONS: FGFR3 mutation analysis on voided urine is a simple and noninvasive diagnostic method for detection of recurrences during surveillance of patients presenting with a low-grade FGFR3-mutant NMI-BC tumor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.426
Teacher spread0.367 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations102
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer ResearchSame topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207