MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097156126 · doi:10.1109/vtcf.2006.543

Connectivity and Bit Error Rate Analysis of Mobile Ad Hoc Wireless Networks

2006· article· en· W2097156126 on OpenAlexaff
Golnaz Farhadi, Norman C. Beaulieu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Vehicular Technology Conference · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Ad Hoc Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer networkComputer scienceWireless ad hoc networkMobile ad hoc networkRician fadingNode (physics)Mobility modelWireless networkBit error rateFadingWirelessTelecommunicationsNetwork packetChannel (broadcasting)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One- and two-dimensional ad hoc wireless networks with uniformly distributed (static) nodes and networks with nodes which move according to the random waypoint mobility model are considered. The inter-distance distributions between any two nodes within these networks are obtained. The network connectivity is considered and the minimum transmission range is derived. The bit error rate performance is then analytically evaluated in the connected regions of the networks taking into account the effect of path loss and Nakagami-mor Rician fading. It is shown that increasing the number of users increases the network connectivity, decreases the minimum transmission range, and improves the performance. It is also shown that node mobility enhances the network connectivity and performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Vehicular Technology ConferenceSame topicMobile Ad Hoc NetworksFrench-language works237,207