MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097218667 · doi:10.1093/jac/49.4.693

An in vitro evaluation of the antibiotic/heparin lock to sterilize central venous haemodialysis catheters

2002· article· en· W2097218667 on OpenAlexafffund
Lavern M. Vercaigne, Sheryl Zelenitsky, I. Findlay, Keevin Bernstein, S. Brian Penner

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersKidney Foundation of Canada
KeywordsCefazolinHeparinCatheterGentamicinStaphylococcus epidermidisMedicineVancomycinAntibioticsCentral venous catheterSurgeryStaphylococcus aureusMicrobiologyBiologyBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This in vitro study investigated the ability of antibiotic/heparin locks to sterilize central venous haemodialysis catheters (CVCs) inoculated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE). Isolates of MRSE were incubated in broth inside CVCs. The catheters were then drained and filled with either vancomycin/gentamicin/heparin (VGH), cefazolin/gentamicin/ heparin (CGH) or control locks for 48 h. The catheters were drained, filled with fresh broth and again incubated. The final catheter solutions were sampled and the remaining volumes filtered. The samples, filters and catheter segments were examined for growth. For two isolates, both the VGH and CGH locks sterilized the catheters. Bacterial counts of the remaining two isolates were significantly reduced by >99%, but the catheters were not sterilized after the instillation of a single-antibiotic/heparin lock.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Antimicrobial ChemotherapySame topicCentral Venous Catheters and HemodialysisFrench-language works237,207