MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097232115 · doi:10.1109/newcas.2004.1359116

Carry free, bit parallel approximate squarers with linear complexity and constant delay

2004· article· en· W2097232115 on OpenAlexaff
J. M. Pierre Langlois, D. Al-Khalili, H. Al-Hetani

Bibliographic record

VenueThe 2nd Annual IEEE Northeast Workshop on Circuits and Systems, 2004. NEWCAS 2004. · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNumerical Methods and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParameterized complexityConstant (computer programming)Function (biology)Boolean functionBit (key)Computer scienceSimple (philosophy)AlgorithmMathematicsLookup tableArithmetic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents two simple combinational logic design approaches for bit-parallel approximate squarers of unsigned numbers. The design approaches are suitable for squarers of any bit length, and are particularly well suited for implementation in LUT-based FPGAs. It is shown that the hardware requirements grow linearly with the input bit width, as opposed to recent work where the complexity grows quadratically. This is a consequence of the optimized function selection algorithm which limits the number of input variables to each bit function. It is also shown that the critical path delay is independent of the input bit width. The proposed sets of Boolean equations are very simple to use and lend themselves very well to a parameterized HDL description. For a 7-bit input squarer, the maximum relative error (MRE) and average relative error (ARE) are as low as 9.44% and 2.47%, respectively. For very wide input, the MRE and ARE asymptotically approach 11.3% and 4.5%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe 2nd Annual IEEE Northeast Workshop on Circuits and Systems, 2004. NEWCAS 2004.Same topicNumerical Methods and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207