Paleoenvironmental and basin analysis of the late Neoproterozoic (Ediacaran) upper Conception and St. John's groups, west Conception Bay, Newfoundland
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Conception and St. John's groups consist of deep-marine, fine-grained siliciclastic–volcaniclastic rocks with abundant impressions of Ediacaran body fossils. Based on previous tectonic reconstructions, these strata are interpreted to have accumulated during the transition from a fore arc (phase 1, ca. 630–560 Ma) to a strike-slip pull-apart basin (phase 2, ca. 560–540 Ma). The Drook and Mistaken Point formations accumulated during phase 1 and are characterized by tabular, thick- to medium-bedded turbidites (east-southeast paleoflow directions), contourites (southwest paleoflow directions), and volcanic ash beds. The high proportion of each bed consisting of T E (Bouma turbidite division) mudstone, and the lack of correlation between bed thickness and basal grain size, suggest ponding of the turbidity currents. The differences in paleoflow directions and texture between Conception Bay and equivalent units at Mistaken Point imply that the two areas may have been geographically isolated from each other; phase 1 deposition in the study area is inferred to have taken place in the basin-plain portion of a transversely supplied, partially confined sub-basin. This "west Conception sub-basin" is bounded to the east by outcrops of the older Harbour Main Group that we speculate may have been a topographic high separating the sub-basin from the main fore-arc basin located to the present-day east. The Trepassey and Fermeuse formations represent phase 2 and are characterized by tabular thin-bedded turbidites, slump deposits, and volumetrically minor amounts of volcanic ash that accumulated on a southwesterly prograding slope. The regional consistency of lithologies and paleoflow directions throughout the Avalon Peninsula suggest that basin differentiation was minimal at this time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".