Horizontal management: implementing programs across interdependent organizations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: Horizontal management is generally recognized as a ubiquitous feature of modern public administration. Current theory is reviewed and its limitations exposed. A theory of interdependencies, organizational structure and consensus is developed and illustrated. The practical import of the theory is illustrated with regard to questions of leadership and accountability. The pedagogic implications for teaching the required skills for horizontal management are outlined. Sommaire: La gestion horizontale est généralement reconnue comme un élément omniprésent de l'administration publique moderne. Dans cet article, nous réexaminons la théorie actuelle et nous en exposons ses limites. Nous élaborons et illustrons une théorie d'interdépendance, de structure organisationnelle et de consensus. Nous faisons état de la signification pratique de la théorie et ce qui concerne le leadership et l'imputabilité. Enfin, nous présentons les implications pédagogiques pour 1'enseignement des aptitudes nécessaires à la gestion horizontale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".