MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097347278 · doi:10.7202/013909ar

Les savoirs d’expérience : épistémologie de leurs tout premiers moments

2006· article· fr· W2097347278 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Yanik Simard

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des sciences de l éducation · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicSocial Representations and Identity
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La notion de représentation, et surtout celle du changement de représentation, sont centrales aux savoirs d’expérience. Diverses étapes relatives à ce changement ont été identifiées, mais l’épistémologie de « leurs tout premiers moments » semble particulièrement important. Dans cet article, nous proposons l’étude d’un antécédent possible au changement de représentation : l’expérience du il y a . Cette expérience rejoindrait en partie les phases de l’impulsion (Dewey), du dégel (Lewin), d’accommodation (Piaget) et de l’appréhension (Kolb) ; cependant, elle leur serait ontologiquement antérieure. Mais comment cet antécédent expérientiel se retrouverait-il effectivement dans les changements de représentation antérieurs à l’acquisition des savoirs d’expérience ?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.959

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.437
GPT teacher head0.489
Teacher spread0.053 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue des sciences de l éducationSame topicSocial Representations and IdentityFrench-language works237,207