MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097351823 · doi:10.1109/memea.2011.5966752

Signal enhancement of wearable ECG monitoring sensors based on Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition

2011· article· en· W2097351823 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicECG Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHilbert–Huang transformComputer scienceNoise (video)Wearable computerArtificial intelligenceSIGNAL (programming language)Pattern recognition (psychology)Noise reductionSpeech recognitionComputer visionFilter (signal processing)Embedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of electrocardiogram (ECG) signals is an important standard for the diagnosis of heart diseases and other pathological phenomena. The ECG signal, however, is always contaminated by different types of noise, especially when the sensor is worn by patients during their normal activities, where the muscle and motion artefact are the dominant noise. This paper proposes a novel ECG enhancement method, which is based on Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition, to eliminate the contact noise in the signals. The performance of the proposed method is validated by using real data from the MIT-BIH database. Simulation results show that ECG signals from wearable monitoring sensors can be significantly enhanced by filtering out the contact noise while keeping all of the ECG features. The EEMD-based method exhibits obvious advantages over other similar ones in terms of de-noising.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.292
Threshold uncertainty score0.464

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicECG Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207