MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097352459 · doi:10.1109/pacrim.2013.6625508

Non-stationary signals separation using STFT and affinity propagation clustering algorithm

2013· article· en· W2097352459 on OpenAlexaff
Farook Sattar, Peter F. Driessen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCluster analysisAffinity propagationShort-time Fourier transformComputer scienceBlind signal separationA priori and a posterioriPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceAlgorithmFourier transformSIGNAL (programming language)Matrix (chemical analysis)Data miningMathematicsCorrelation clusteringCanopy clustering algorithmFourier analysisChannel (broadcasting)Chromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we address the problem of separating N unknown non-stationary signals using as many observed mixtures. Using short-term Fourier Transform (STFT) of the mixtures along with a classification approach based on affinity propagation (AP) clustering provide an efficient technique for separating non-stationary signals. The proposed method is featured by its simplicity and improved classification compared to other existing TF based signal separation methods. The method can tackle both the mono-component as well as multi-component signals and its assumptions about the mixing matrix are more relaxed than other existing methods. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first signal separation approach based on AP clustering. Besides improved clustering the AP does not require apriori knowledge of the number of clusters. Examples, using synthetic as well as real-life data, are presented to demonstrate the validity and efficiency of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score0.380

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207