MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097354710 · doi:10.1142/s0218196704001967

THE GLOBALS OF SOME SUBPSEUDOVARIETIES OF $\mathsf{DA}$

2004· article· en· W2097354710 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jorge Almeida, Ana Escada

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Algebra and Computation · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
Topicsemigroups and automata theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaUniversidade do PortoMcGill University
KeywordsMathematicsSemidirect productCombinatoricsPure mathematicsGroup (periodic table)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let [Formula: see text] be the pseudovariety of all finite monoids whose principal right ideals have a unique generator, let [Formula: see text] be its dual, and let [Formula: see text]. Using the word problem for free pro-[Formula: see text] monoids, it is shown that the bilateral semidirect product [Formula: see text] is local, where [Formula: see text] denotes the pseudovariety of all finite semilattices. The global of the pseudovariety where [Formula: see text] is also computed and it is shown that this join is not local.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Algebra and ComputationSame topicsemigroups and automata theoryFrench-language works237,207