Bibliographic record
Abstract
Trois domaines de spécialisation ont surtout retenu l’attention des seiziémistes québécois, tant anglophones que francophones. Les études rabelaisiennes et shakespeariennes ont connu un développement qui s’est accéléré depuis 1990. Analysés sous l’angle de la généricité (gender) et de leur fonctionnement rhétorique, les écrits des femmes ont suscité de nombreux travaux qui s’attachent notamment à montrer comment s’affirme la spécificité de la subjectivité féminine à travers l’écriture. Enfin, le champ de la traduction et les réflexions issues de la traductologie ont amené les chercheurs à aborder les textes renaissants dans une perspective transculturelle des plus novatrices. Ces recherches caractérisées par des collaborations interdisciplinaires et souvent internationales témoignent de l’intérêt croissant que la Renaissance française a suscité au Québec au cours des trois dernières décennies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".