The female reproductive system and control of oviposition in Locusta migratoria migratorioidesThe present review is the first of a series of occasional review articles that have been invited by the Editors and will feature the broad range of disciplines and expertise represented in our Editorial Advisory Board.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The spermatheca acts as a repository for sperm deposited by the male and, in the African migratory locust ( Locusta migratoria migratorioides (Fairmaire and Reiche, 1849)), is situated dorsal to the lateral and common oviducts. In the locust, eggs mature in the ovaries and are ovulated into the lateral oviducts where they are held until a suitable oviposition site is found. At that time, a hole is dug in the soil by the locust and, aided by muscular contractions of the upper lateral oviducts, the eggs are propelled through the common oviduct and genital chamber and deposited in a pod in the soil. Contractions of the spermathecal sac lead to sperm release, resulting in fertilization of eggs in the genital chamber. Coordination of digging and of the oviducts and spermatheca is clearly critical to the production of viable eggs. The muscles responsible for digging and both reproductive structures are under central neuronal control, incorporating neurons that express an array of neuropeptide and amine phenotypes. Many of the phenotypes are common to both reproductive tissues. A neural loop ensures the coordinated release of sperm when an egg passes into the genital chamber. This review will discuss our understanding of the neural control of these reproductive tissues and their coordination with digging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".