Recurrence report of Ehrlichia canis in dog blood samples in Cali, Colombia.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESUMEN: El presente estudio reporta la presentación de la Ehrlichiosis canina en la ciudad de Cali- Colombia, de acuerdo con la raza, sexo y edad de los perros. Bajo las condiciones de un estudio de tipo descriptivo retrospectivo cuyas fuentes de información fueron secundarias, representadas en 101 muestras sanguíneas de caninos, analizadas mediante el método de ELISA de un test comercial para la detección de anticuerpos específicos contra Ehrlichia canis, se encontró que los caninos de raza Labrador, Poodle y Schnawzer fueron las razas con mayor presencia de anticuerpos contra la enfermedad. Caninos de ambos sexos y desde los 6 hasta los 144 meses de edad fueron afectados por la enfermedad. Bajo las condiciones del presente estudio, se puede concluir que el agente causal de la Ehrlichiosis canina está afectando la población canina de la ciudad de Cali, y los perros de raza Labrador fueron los más afectados por el parásito, al igual que los machos en edad adulta.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".