Role of M-CSF-dependent macrophages in colitis is driven by the nature of the inflammatory stimulus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although macrophages are considered a critical factor in determining the severity of acute inflammatory responses in the gut, recent evidence has indicated that macrophages may also play a counterinflammatory role. In this study, we examined the role of a macrophage subset in two models of colitis. Macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF)-deficient osteopetrotic mice (op/op) and M-CSF-expressing heterozygote (+/?) mice were studied following the induction of colitis by either dinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (DNBS) or dextran sulfate sodium (DSS). DNBS induced a severe colitis in M-CSF-deficient op/op mice compared with +/? mice. This was associated with increased mortality and more severe macroscopic and microscopic injury. Colonic tissue myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity as well as concentrations of TNF-alpha, IL-1beta, and IL-6 were higher and IL-10 lower in op/op mice with DNBS colitis. The severity of inflammation and mortality was attenuated in op/op mice that had received human recombinant M-CSF prior to the induction of colitis. In contrast, op/op mice appeared less vulnerable to colitis induced by DSS. Macroscopic damage, microscopic injury, MPO activity, and tissue concentrations of TNF-alpha, IL-1beta, and IL-6 were all lower in op/op mice compared with +/? mice with DSS colitis, and no changes were seen in IL-10. Macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha concentrations were increased in op/op but not +/? mice following colitis induced by DNBS but not DSS. These results indicate that M-CSF-dependent macrophages may play either a pro- or counterinflammatory role in acute experimental colitis, depending on the stimulus used to induce colitis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".