Neutrophils Are Essential for Rapid Clearance of<i>Enterococcus faecium</i>in Mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A progressive increase in infections with multiresistant Enterococcus faecium has been reported, especially in cancer patients and neutropenic patients. Despite its increasing importance as a nosocomial pathogen, knowledge of the pathogenesis of E. faecium infections is highly limited. In this study, we investigated the role of neutrophils during peritonitis with subsequent bacteremia caused by E. faecium. Therefore, we depleted neutrophils by intraperitoneal injections of monoclonal antibody RB6-8C5. Mice were followed for 5 days, and the enterococcal outgrowth and inflammatory response were compared between neutropenic mice and immunoglobulin G-injected control mice. Neutropenic mice demonstrated a severe delay in enterococcal clearance from all cultured organs (peritoneal fluid, blood, and lung and liver tissue). In particular, neutropenic mice remained bacteremic for up to 3 days, whereas all nonneutropenic mice had cleared the bacteria from circulation by 2 days. Furthermore, neutropenic mice displayed elevated peritoneal cytokine and chemokine levels 1 day after the infection and attracted fewer macrophages into the peritoneal cavity. In the circulation, a prolonged elevation of tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin-6, and the acute-phase proteins serum amyloid A and complement 3 were measured in neutropenic mice. In conclusion, attraction of neutrophils to the primary site of E. faecium infection is important for a rapid clearance of this bacterium, thereby attenuating a systemic inflammatory response.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".