MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097420825 · doi:10.14257/ijbsbt.2014.6.2.16

Measuring Similarity by Prediction Class between Biomedical Datasets via Fuzzy Unordered Rule Induction

2014· article· en· W2097420825 on OpenAlexaff
Simon Fong, Osama A. Mohammed, Jinan Fiaidhi, Sabah Mohammed, Chee Keong Kwoh

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Bio-Science and Bio-Technology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGene expression and cancer classification
Canadian institutionsLakehead UniversityUniversity of Victoria
FundersUniversidade de Macau
KeywordsRule inductionData miningSimilarity (geometry)Class (philosophy)Computer scienceFuzzy ruleArtificial intelligenceRule-based systemFuzzy logicPattern recognition (psychology)Machine learningFuzzy set

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The need of similarity measures in life science is ever paramount given the modern biotechnology in producing and storing biomedical datasets in large amounts.This paper presents a novel scheme in measuring similarity of two datasets by prediction class, namely SPC.SPC offers an alternative approach to traditionally used ones such as pairwise correlations which assume every attribute carries equal importance.The unique advantage of SPC is the use of a machine learning model called Fuzzy Unordered Rule Induction to infer the similarity between two datasets based on their common attributes and their degrees of relevance pertaining to a predicted class.The method is demonstrated by a case of comparing lung cancer dataset and heart disease dataset.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Bio-Science and Bio-TechnologySame topicGene expression and cancer classificationFrench-language works237,207