Molecular Alterations during Progression of Prostate Cancer to Androgen Independence
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among men in North America and is a leading cause of death. Standard treatments include androgen deprivation therapy, which leads to improved clinical outcomes. However, over time, most tumors become androgen independent and no longer respond to hormonal therapies. Several mechanisms have been implicated in the progression of prostate cancer to androgen independence. CONTENT: Most tumors that have become androgen independent still rely on androgen receptor (AR) signaling. Mechanisms that enhance AR signaling in androgen-depleted conditions include: AR gene amplification, AR mutations, changes in the balance of AR cofactors, increases in steroidogenic precursors, and activation via "outlaw" pathways. Along with AR signaling, various other AR-independent "bypass" pathways have been shown to operate aberrantly during androgen independence. Changes in the epigenetic signatures and microRNA concentrations have also been implicated in the development of androgen-independent prostate cancer. SUMMARY: Understanding of the molecular mechanisms that lead to the development of androgen-independent prostate cancer will allow for improved therapeutic strategies that target key pathways and molecules that are essential for these cells to survive.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it