MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097498544 · doi:10.1177/0008429814539097

Yahvé et les sages de Babylone

2014· article· fr· W2097498544 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Éric Bellavance

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAncient Near East History
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La poésie hébraïque est généralement très concise : les vers sont courts et ne comprennent souvent que deux ou trois mots. La poésie du Deutéro-Isaïe ne fait pas exception. Mais en utilisant sciemment certains mots auxquels il est possible d’attribuer plus d’un sens, le prophète est en mesure de formuler un message beaucoup plus complet et complexe que le texte ne le suggère à première vue, tout en conservant la concision habituelle de la poésie hébraïque classique. Cette complexité est particulièrement bien illustrée dans un passage où le prophète se moque des devins et des sages babyloniens (Is 44,25), afin de démontrer à ses auditeurs que Yahvé est le seul et unique responsable de la libération de son peuple et qu’il est derrière la décision du roi perse Cyrus de reconstruire Jérusalem et son temple.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.592
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.010
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in Religion/Sciences ReligieusesSame topicAncient Near East HistoryFrench-language works237,207