MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097511843 · doi:10.7202/029764ar

Les problèmes de santé mentale sont-ils détectés par les omnipraticiens ? Regard sur la perspective des omnipraticiens selon les banques de données administratives

2009· article· fr· W2097511843 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Youcef Ouadahi, Alain Lesage, Jean‐Paul Rodrigue, Marie‐Josée Fleury

Bibliographic record

VenueSanté mentale au Québec · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, Medicine and Society
Canadian institutionsDouglas Mental Health University Institute
FundersMinistère de la SantéMinistère de la Santé et des Services sociauxCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhysicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les problèmes de santé mentale sont-ils détectés par les omnipraticiens ? Regard sur la perspective des omnipraticiens selon les banques de données administratives. Un article de la revue Santé mentale au Québec (Santé mentale en première ligne) diffusée par la plateforme Érudit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2009
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSanté mentale au QuébecSame topicHealth, Medicine and SocietyFrench-language works237,207