MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097535579 · doi:10.1109/icma.2005.1626847

Carbon nanotube enhanced pulsed electric field electroporation for biomedical applications

2006· article· en· W2097535579 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrobial Inactivation Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectroporationCarbon nanotubeMaterials scienceMembraneElectric fieldNanotechnologyNucleic acidMembrane permeabilityChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pulsed electric fields (PEF) are commonly used in microbial electroporation applications. Emerging lab-on-a-chip technologies use PEF to control membrane permeability to access internal cellular contents including nucleic acids and proteins. If micropores in the membrane (created by E field) are significant in terms of size, persistence time and number, in comparison to the overall membrane area, the conditions for mechanical destruction of the cell membrane are favoured. Membrane breakdown is associated with cell death and dispersal of cell contents including nucleic acids and protein. This paper serves as an initial investigation into the use of carbon nanotubes (CNT) to reduce the voltage requirements for irreversible electroporation for portable lab-on-a-chip devices with strict power limitations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.850
Threshold uncertainty score0.358

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrobial Inactivation MethodsFrench-language works237,207