MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2097544143 · doi:10.5539/apr.v6n2p69

Theoretical Electronic Structure of the Lowest-Lying Electronic States of the CaBr Molecule

2014· article· en· W2097544143 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hatim Jawhari, Mahmoud Korek, R. Awad, M. R. Sakr

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultireference configuration interactionAtomic physicsDipolePotential energyPerturbation theory (quantum mechanics)PhysicsElectronic structureConfiguration interactionQuantum mechanicsExcited state

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sixteen doublet and nine quartet potential energy curves of the low-lying electronic states, in the 2s+1L(±) representation of the molecule CaBr, have been investigated via the Multireference Con?guration Interaction method (MRCI) and second-order Multireference Perturbation Theory (RPST2). The harmonic vibrational frequency we, the internuclear distance at equilibrium Re, the rotational constant Be, the electronic energy with respect to the minimum ground state energy Te, and the permanent dipole moment at the internuclear distance at equilibrium m have been calculated. By using the canonical functions approach, the eigenvalues Ev, the rotational constant Bv and the abscissas of the turning points Rmin and Rmax have been calculated for the studied electronic states. By comparing the values of the investigated data to the theoretical and experimental results available in the literature shows a good agreement. For the first time 15 new electronic states have been studied theoretically in the present work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics Research→Same topicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies→French-language works237,207→