Overweight or obese young people are not at increased risk of depression, but young people with depression are at increased risk of obesity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Commentary on: Roberts RE, Duong HT. Obese youths are not more likely to become depressed, but depressed youths are more likely to become obese. Psychol Med 2013;43:2143–51.[OpenUrl][1][CrossRef][2][PubMed][3] Obesity and depression have both been associated with adverse health outcomes in young people.1 A growing body of evidence has investigated whether a link exists between these two conditions, suggesting that one may act as a risk factor for the other. To date, the evidence about the nature and strength of this relationship has been mixed, with the majority of studies examining … [1]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DPsychol%2BMed%26rft.volume%253D43%26rft.spage%253D2143%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1017%252FS0033291712002991%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F23298458%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [2]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1017/S0033291712002991&link_type=DOI [3]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=23298458&link_type=MED&atom=%2Febnurs%2F17%2F4%2F112.atom
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.038 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.019 | 0.021 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.056 | 0.031 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".