MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097575838 · doi:10.2140/ant.2017.11.767

Cup products of line bundles on homogeneous varieties and generalized PRV components of multiplicity one

2017· article· en· W2097575838 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAlgebra & Number Theory · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiplicity (mathematics)Tensor productHomogeneousBoundary (topology)Flag (linear algebra)Product (mathematics)Line (geometry)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let [math] and let [math] and [math] be two line bundles on [math] . Consider the cup-product map ¶\n<math display="block">\n<mrow> <msup><mrow><mo class="qopname">H</mo></mrow><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>d</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub> </mrow></msup><mrow><mo class="MathClass-open">(</mo><mrow><mo class="qopname">X</mo><mo class="MathClass-punc">,</mo><msub><mrow><mo class="qopname">L</mo></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub></mrow><mo class="MathClass-close">)</mo></mrow> <mo class="MathClass-bin">⊗</mo><msup><mrow><mo class="qopname"> H</mo></mrow><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>d</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub> </mrow></msup><mrow><mo class="MathClass-open">(</mo><mrow><mo class="qopname">X</mo><mo class="MathClass-punc">,</mo><msub><mrow><mo class="qopname">L</mo></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></mrow><mo class="MathClass-close">)</mo></mrow><munderover> <mo class="MathClass-rel">→</mo><mrow/><mrow><mo class="MathClass-bin">∪</mo></mrow></munderover><msup><mrow><mo class="qopname">H</mo></mrow><mrow><mi>d</mi></mrow></msup><mrow><mo class="MathClass-open">(</mo><mrow><mo class="qopname">X</mo><mo class="MathClass-punc">,</mo><mo class="qopname">L</mo></mrow><mo class="MathClass-close">)</mo></mrow><mo class="MathClass-punc">,</mo> </mrow>\n</math>\n¶ where [math] and [math] . We answer two natural questions about the map above: When is it a nonzero homomorphism of representations of [math] ? Conversely, given generic irreducible representations [math] and [math] , which irreducible components of [math] may appear in the right hand side of the equation above? For the first question we find a combinatorial condition expressed in terms of inversion sets of Weyl group elements. The answer to the second question is especially elegant: the representations [math] appearing in the right hand side of the equation above are exactly the generalized PRV components of [math] of stable multiplicity one. Furthermore, the highest weights [math] corresponding to the representations [math] fill up the generic faces of the Littlewood–Richardson cone of [math] of codimension equal to the rank of [math] . In particular, we conclude that the corresponding Littlewood–Richardson coefficients equal one.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it