MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097587239

Microbial Activity during Biodegradation and its Effects on Groundwater Velocity in a Contaminated Aquifer

2008· dissertation· en· W2097587239 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
P.C. Schillig

Bibliographic record

VenueKU ScholarWorks (The University of Kansas) · 2008
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicGroundwater flow and contamination studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAquiferGroundwaterBiodegradationContaminated groundwaterContaminationEnvironmental scienceGroundwater contaminationEnvironmental chemistryEnvironmental engineeringGeotechnical engineeringGeologyEcologyEnvironmental remediationChemistryBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A petroleum hydrocarbon plume was introduced into a controlled flow gate within the relatively homogenous Borden aquifer, Canada. Down-gradient of the release, O2 was added to stimulate microbial activity and biodegradation in the aquifer. Changes in groundwater velocity associated with biological activity, were measured with point velocity probes (PVPs) arranged into multilevel standpipes and installed into the flow gate. PVP results were compared with electromagnetic wave velocity measurements from a ground penetrating radar (GPR) survey conducted in the same flow gate. Following the addition of O2, PVP and GPR measured velocities nearest the O2 source changed in a consistent manner throughout the experiment. GPR velocities measured outside the influence of the added O2 did not indicate the same trend. Results from flow modeling combined with gas and biomass measurements, show that PVP and GPR velocity changes were likely caused by factors related to elevated levels biological activity in the aquifer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.813
Threshold uncertainty score0.972

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKU ScholarWorks (The University of Kansas)Same topicGroundwater flow and contamination studiesFrench-language works237,207