Glucose-induced endothelial heparanase secretion requires cortical and stress actin reorganization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: Heparanase, which specifically cleaves carbohydrate chains of heparan sulfate, has been implicated in the pathology of diabetes-associated complications. Using high glucose (HG) to replicate hyperglycaemia observed following diabetes, the present study was designed to determine the mechanism by which HG initiates endothelial heparanase secretion. METHOD AND RESULTS: To examine the effect of HG on endothelial heparanase, bovine coronary artery endothelial cells were incubated with 25 mM glucose. Strategies using different agonists and antagonists were used to determine the mechanism behind HG-induced heparanase secretion. In endothelial cells, heparanase colocalized with lysosomes predominately around the nucleus, and HG caused its dispersion towards the plasma membrane for subsequent secretion. ATP release, purinergic receptor activation, cortical actin disassembly, and stress actin formation were essential for this HG-induced heparanase secretion. With HG, phosphorylation of filamin likely contributed to the cortical actin disassembly, whereas Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase /heat shock protein 25 phosphorylation mediated stress actin formation. The endothelial secreted heparanase in response to HG demonstrated endoglucuronidase activity, cleaved heparan sulfate, and released attached proteins like lipoprotein lipase and basic fibroblast growth factor. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that HG is a potent stimulator of endothelial heparanase secretion. These data may assist in devising new therapeutic strategies to prevent or delay the cardiovascular complications associated with diabetes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".