MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097615594 · doi:10.1109/pes.2007.385548

D-based Predictive Control for Enhancement of Distribution System Stability and Operation

2007· article· en· W2097615594 on OpenAlexaff
Lin Wang, Richard Cheung

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModel predictive controlStability (learning theory)Generator (circuit theory)ElectricityComputer scienceDigital signal processingElectric power systemControl theory (sociology)Electricity generationControl systemPower (physics)Control engineeringPower controlControl (management)EngineeringElectrical engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The stability of bulk power electricity systems has been well studied for decades. Conversely the stability study for newly deregulated distribution power systems with dispersed generations from small conventional or alternate energy sources has been virtually limited. Stability concerns, however, increase rapidly with today's growing demands for open access to power systems for electricity generation and trading, facilitated by new government deregulations. This paper presents a novel generator control based on step-ahead predictive methodology and state-of- the-art real-time digital signal processing (DSP) technology. This DSP-control-based (D-based) Predictive Control is built upon optimization of a specific performance index defined as a weighted combination of generator voltage deviation, mechanical and electrical torques mismatch, incremental generator speed, etc. This paper demonstrates that the D-based Predictive Control can significantly improve the stability and operational coordination of distribution systems particularly those with dispersed generations, open access operations, or weakly connections to bulk power systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Power Engineering Society General MeetingSame topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207