Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary C4photosynthesis is a series of anatomical and biochemical modifications that concentrate CO2around the carboxylating enzyme Rubisco, thereby increasing photosynthetic efficiency in conditions promoting high rates of photorespiration. The C4pathway independently evolved over 45 times in 19 families of angiosperms, and thus represents one of the most convergent of evolutionary phenomena. Most origins of C4photosynthesis occurred in the dicots, with at least 30 lineages. C4photosynthesis first arose in grasses, probably during the Oligocene epoch (24–35 million yr ago). The earliest C4dicots are likely members of the Chenopodiaceae dating back 15–21 million yr; however, most C4dicot lineages are estimated to have appeared relatively recently, perhaps less than 5 million yr ago. C4photosynthesis in the dicots originated in arid regions of low latitude, implicating combined effects of heat, drought and/or salinity as important conditions promoting C4evolution. Low atmospheric CO2is a significant contributing factor, because it is required for high rates of photorespiration. Consistently, the appearance of C4plants in the evolutionary record coincides with periods of increasing global aridification and declining atmospheric CO2. Gene duplication followed by neo‐ and nonfunctionalization are the leading mechanisms for creating C4genomes, with selection for carbon conservation traits under conditions promoting high photorespiration being the ultimate factor behind the origin of C4photosynthesis. Contents Summary 341 I. Introduction 342 II. What is C4photosynthesis? 343 III. Why did C4photosynthesis evolve? 347 IV. Evolutionary lineages of C4photosynthesis 348 V. Where did C4photosynthesis evolve? 350 VI. How did C4photosynthesis evolve? 352 VII. Molecular evolution of C4photosynthesis 361 VIII. When did C4photosynthesis evolve 362 IX. The rise of C4photosynthesis in relation to climate and CO2 363 X. Final thoughts: the future evolution of C4photosynthesis 365 Acknowledgements 365 References 365
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".