MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The origin and properties of intracluster stars in a rich cluster

2004· article· en· W2097616974 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstronomy and Astrophysical Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGalaxy clusterIntracluster mediumGalaxySurface brightnessGalaxy formation and evolutionStarsDark matterCluster (spacecraft)LuminosityStar formation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We use a multimillion particle N‐body + smooth particle hydrodynamics (SPH) simulation to follow the formation of a rich galaxy cluster in a Λ‐cold dark matter (ΛCDM) cosmology, with the goal of understanding the origin and properties of intracluster stars. The simulation includes gas cooling, star formation, the effects of a uniform ultraviolet background and feedback from supernovae. Haloes that host galaxies as faint as MR=−19.0 are resolved by this simulation, which includes 85 per cent of the total galaxy luminosity in a rich cluster. We find that the accumulation of intracluster light (ICL) is an ongoing process, linked to infall and stripping events. The unbound star fraction varies with time between 10 and 22 per cent of the total amount of cluster stars, with an overall trend to increase with time. The fraction is 20 per cent at z= 0, consistent with observations of galaxy clusters. The surface brightness profile of the cD galaxy shows an excess compared with a de Vaucouleur profile near 200 kpc, which is also consistent with observations. Both massive and small galaxies contribute to the formation of the ICL, with stars stripped preferentially from the outer, lower‐metallicity parts of their stellar distributions. Simulated observations of planetary nebulae (PNe) show significant substructure in velocity space, tracing separate streams of stripped intracluster stars. Despite an unrelaxed distribution, individual intracluster PNe might be useful mass tracers if more than five fields at a range of radii have measured line‐of‐sight velocities, where an accurate mass calculation depends more on the number of fields than the number of PNe measured per field. However, the orbits of intracluster stars are more anisotropic than those of galaxies or dark matter, which leads to a systematic underestimate of cluster mass relative to that calculated with galaxies, if not accounted for in dynamical models. Overall, the properties of ICL formed in a hierarchical scenario are in good agreement with current observations, supporting a model where ICL originates from the dynamical evolution of galaxies in dense environments. ICL should thus be ubiquitous in galaxy clusters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.526
Threshold uncertainty score0.367

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations135
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchFrench-language works237,207