STFT-Based Segmentation in Model-Based Seizure Detection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To aid the review of long-term electroencephalograph (EEG), it is necessary to develop automatic seizure detection methods. In the literature, numerous seizure detection methods based on parameterization of the EEG have been presented. Recently a new patient-specific model-based method using Statistically Optimal Null Filters (SONF) has been proposed for seizure detection [1], This method uses stationary segments of a template seizure to generate the necessary seizure model (basis functions) that is used for all subsequent seizure detections. In this approach, the necessary stationary segments within the template are manually identified based on the constancy of the dominant rhythm. The manual selection of stationary segments is cumbersome in practice. In this paper, we present short-time-Fourier-transform (STFT) based automatic segmentation of template seizure resulting in practically usable model-based seizure detection. To assess the performance of the proposed algorithm, a comparison with the visual (manual) method of epoch selection on simulated as well as on the template seizures of five different patients is done. The overall performance improvements are evident in terms of enhanced seizure detection sensitivity and reduced number of false positives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".