Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite its great relevance as an indicator of change in soil quality conditions, 1 3 7 Cs redistribution has not been widely suggested for inclusion in minimum data sets for soil quality evaluations.In part, this is due to a perception that its high variability precludes its use. 1 3 7 Cs typically has a coefficient of variation of about 20% in the reference sites used to estimate redistribution in disturbed landscapes.Recent studies on changes in soil quality indicators (including 1 3 7 Cs) in Saskatchewan, Canada and nort h e a s t e rn Ghana indicate that the variability associated with 1 3 7 Cs in both reference and cultivated sites is ve ry comparable to that for other, commonly measured indicators of soil quality such as organic carbon and soil nitrogen.The sampling requirements for 1 3 7 Cs are ve ry similar to these other p r o p e rties (i.e., 15-30 samples per sites are required for accurate estimates of central tendency) and hence its variability should not preclude its adoption as a soil quality indicator.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it