MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2097702672 · doi:10.1109/pac.1991.164958

Development and performance of electrostatic deflector insulators for the Chalk River superconducting cyclotron

2002· article· en· W2097702672 on OpenAlexaff
C. R. Hoffmann, J.F. Mouris

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsAtomic Energy (Canada)Canadian Nuclear Laboratories
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCyclotronInsulator (electricity)ResistorVoltageElectrical engineeringElectrodeHigh voltageSuperconductivityMaterials sciencePhysicsOptoelectronicsNuclear physicsEngineeringElectronCondensed matter physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The electrostatic deflector in the Chalk River superconducting cyclotron has a dee shape, and has a single fixed deflector electrode suspended from two insulators located above the midplane. One of them contains a high-voltage cable and a series water resistor to limit energy available to a spark and to isolate the high-voltage cable and DC power supply from RF pickup. The other insulator is a conventional cylindrical post. The insulators have been changed from the original design to make them less prone to thermal damage from RF heating. Details are given of the water system electrical performance and of insulator modifications and performance.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics→French-language works237,207→