MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097709154 · doi:10.1109/ultsym.2002.1192634

Modeling nonlinear ultrasound propagation in tissue from array transducers and application to tissue harmonic imaging

2003· article· en· W2097709154 on OpenAlexaff
Roger J. Zemp, Jahangir Tavakkoli, R.S.C. Cobbold

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSecond-harmonic imaging microscopyTransducerAttenuationNonlinear systemAcousticsHarmonicNonlinear acousticsComputer scienceDiffractionOpticsPhysicsSecond-harmonic generation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A computational model is presented to simulate nonlinear propagation of ultrasound in tissue from array transducers. The model is based on an operator splitting approach with a fractional step marching scheme, whereby the effects of diffraction, attenuation and nonlinearity can be considered independent over small steps. This algorithm avoids the use of the parabolic approximation used by the KZK model, and may be more accurate for focused sources. Simulated transmitted pressure profiles and pulse-echo second-harmonic point spread functions are presented as examples of the capabilities of the algorithm for design and optimization of tissue harmonic imaging systems. Dynamic focusing and pulse inversion are shown to be advantageous for increasing second harmonic levels, and for improving spatial resolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUltrasound and Hyperthermia ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207